<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Knight Knetwork - Latest Comments in KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:13:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/08/20/killerstartups-killed/#comment-20016993</link><description>Awesome!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shed plans</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:13:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/08/20/killerstartups-killed/#comment-11683701</link><description>It sucks that KillerStartups went the way they did. They're no longer a KillerStartup themselves</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NJ Open Mic</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:17:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/08/20/killerstartups-killed/#comment-8110856</link><description>I agree with wotlk about KillerStartups being a waste of time these days, it's nothing but spam</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pocket_Knifes</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:12:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/08/20/killerstartups-killed/#comment-6748796</link><description>Yeah, I have described KS as a type of blog when I wrote an article about in in a magazin some years ago. I like the way it was, more "personal" than the other startup websites...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cat Food</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:59:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/08/20/killerstartups-killed/#comment-6653319</link><description>I didn't know that startups created such an eco-system around them - reviews, commentaries, people investing their time to provide content about what a business might do. let's get to Economics 2.0 - make company registration free or only a couple of cents, the only IP being its name, then spawn them by the billions and ask for representation in the Senate. you can have a whole "tribe" of start-ups with 0 value individually but worth a lot when put together. And you can write about it.. &amp;lt;grin&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">business reviews</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:50:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/08/20/killerstartups-killed/#comment-3926487</link><description>KillerStartups isn't the same as it was before. It's just a site people use to spam their new crappy startups now. You will hardly ever find anything quality - it'll most likely be buried somewhere within all the crappy sites that are submitted daily..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wotlk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:27:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/08/20/killerstartups-killed/#comment-3579857</link><description>Well, good luck to you Amous.  I hope you read my followup to this.  I've&lt;br&gt;followed up on the numbers as well and Killerstartups continues to look&lt;br&gt;good!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KnightKnetwork</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:35:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/08/20/killerstartups-killed/#comment-3567141</link><description>well today killerstartups view my startup &lt;a href="http://bloggersmosaic.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;bloggersmosaic.com&lt;/a&gt; , and am wating to see the traffic they will bring</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 06:33:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/08/20/killerstartups-killed/#comment-1716738</link><description>Thanks! I just brought that up because we're both directly measured, so no&lt;br&gt;guessing here. Also, if we could get an everyday home page mention in&lt;br&gt;Techcrunch surely would help ;)&lt;br&gt;On the other hand David, thanks to your post about KillerStartups I got to&lt;br&gt;discover your interesting blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">garzuaga</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:25:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/08/20/killerstartups-killed/#comment-1716603</link><description>I did miss that, I'm not familiar with Quantcast but it appears that it may&lt;br&gt;be the most accurate since all the listed items are directly measured.  I&lt;br&gt;hope you'll pardon my incomplete research and I'll adjust the story after I&lt;br&gt;dig a little deeper into what all those graphs claim they are showing.&lt;br&gt;Congratualtions on pulling out of that slump!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KnightKnetwork</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:16:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/08/20/killerstartups-killed/#comment-1716133</link><description>Interesting. Maybe you missed this one &lt;a href="http://www.quantcast.com/profile/traffic-compare?domain0=killerstartups.com&amp;domain1=crunchbase.com&amp;domain2=&amp;domain3=&amp;domain4=" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.quantcast.com/profile/traffic-compar...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both are directly measured. Regards,</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">garzuaga</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:41:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/08/20/killerstartups-killed/#comment-1713221</link><description>Interesting research you have provided here David. The only thing I wanted to add is that I always felt that KillerStarups was more of a blog about startps while the others are better used as rather comprehensive directories. So this may partly explain why KS seems to be on decline, I believe.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">profy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:44:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KillerStartups Killed?</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/08/20/killerstartups-killed/#comment-1706447</link><description>You should check their status in &lt;a href="http://compete.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;compete.com&lt;/a&gt; too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/killerstartups.com+techcrunch.com+tradevibes.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://siteanalytics.compete.com/killerstartups...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The situation is quite sad, and I am sad too, since we got profiled at killerstartups and at the very beginning got some nice traffic and buzz from them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But tradevibes is picking up, and since they now have a deal with ReadWriteWeb the competition might be interesting. Maybe Zemanta should include the ability to choose your favorite provider of specific links. But CB definitely nailed it with the API...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Andraz Tori, Zemanta</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andraz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:31:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>