<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Knight Knetwork - Latest Comments in Spottt Hoppping</title><link>http://knightknetwork.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://knightknetwork.disqus.com/spottt_hoppping/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:48:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Spottt Hoppping</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/02/14/spottt-hoppping/#comment-1282063</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Steve, a quick Google search reveals that Entrecard was not the first with this model either.  I am glad Entrecard works for you.   The topic of David's post however is Spottt.  Spottt has been implemented on the KnightKnetwork with ease.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Franklin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:48:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spottt Hoppping</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/02/14/spottt-hoppping/#comment-1282067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;at least with Entrecard, which I do believe came first, your hopping around to other high quality blogs. with spottt there is so much crap because anyone can be in the network. I tried spottt for a day but took it down bc it only sent me one visitor, whereas Entrecard sent me 68 in the same period of time (1 day). the guys with a million daily impressions just swamp spottt&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:50:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spottt Hoppping</title><link>http://knightknetwork.com/2008/02/14/spottt-hoppping/#comment-1282065</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like it!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Philip Kaplan&lt;br&gt;Founder, Spottt&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philip Kaplan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:36:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>